Planning and zoning: community plans: review under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Vote required
Two Thirds
Fiscal committee
No
Appropriation
No
Current location
Chaptered
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed Assembly
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill modifies California’s Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to address the review of community plans. Specifically, it prevents courts from invalidating development projects approved under community plans that are consistent with CEQA, provided the project application was deemed complete before a court order was issued. The bill also establishes criteria for what constitutes a ‘community plan’ and clarifies the timeline for its application, impacting development projects filed before 2036. It aims to reduce uncertainty and expedite development approvals while ensuring compliance with CEQA.
Key provisions
- Defines ‘community plan’ based on specific criteria including transit priority areas, circulation elements, and housing capacity.
- Prevents court invalidation of development projects approved under community plans that meet CEQA requirements and have a complete application.
- Establishes a timeline for the bill’s application: updates adopted on or after January 1, 2025, and applications filed before January 1, 2036.
- Specifies that the bill addresses a statewide concern, applying to all cities.
- Requires local jurisdictions to have specific elements in their general plans (circulation, housing, fire hazard zones, flood plain management).
- Clarifies that the bill does not alter the obligation for development projects to comply with CEQA.
- Addresses the timing of court orders and project application completeness.
Who is affected
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
2 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours