Public contracts: best value construction contracting for counties, cities, and the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments.
Vote required
Majority
Fiscal committee
No
Appropriation
No
Current location
Enrolled
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill changes how counties, cities, and the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments award construction contracts. Instead of solely focusing on the lowest price, it allows them to select a contractor based on ‘best value,’ considering factors like qualifications, experience, and labor practices. The bill extends the current best value program until January 1, 2040, and requires reporting on projects awarded using this method. It also expands the definition of ‘best value’ and includes provisions related to perjury penalties.
Key provisions
- Allows counties, cities, and the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments to select contractors based on ‘best value’ criteria.
- Extends the current best value construction contracting program until January 1, 2040.
- Increases the minimum project value for best value contracts to $500,000 from $1,000,000.
- Requires reporting on projects awarded using the best value procedure to the Legislature and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee.
- Expands the crime of perjury to include violations related to best value contracts.
- Allows annual contracts for repair and remodeling up to $3 million, adjusted annually.
- Specifies criteria for evaluating bids, including qualifications, financial condition, labor compliance, and safety record.
- Provides for the selection of a contractor if fewer than three responsive bids are received.
Who is affected
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours