AB 1744
Environmental advertising: sunscreen.
Vote required
Majority
Fiscal committee
No
Appropriation
No
Current location
Appropriations
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take action- Introduced
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill prohibits sunscreen manufacturers from using terms like "reef safe" or "ocean friendly" on their products or labels if the sunscreen contains certain chemical ultraviolet filters. It aims to prevent misleading consumers into believing that these products are harmless to marine ecosystems. Violations of this law would be considered misdemeanors.
Key provisions
- It is unlawful to represent a sunscreen product as "reef safe," "reef friendly," or similar terms if it contains specific chemical ultraviolet filters.
- The bill specifically lists chemical filters prohibited from being associated with these terms (avobenzone, homosalate, octinoxate, octisalate, octocrylene, and oxybenzone).
- The definition of "sunscreen product" includes over-the-counter drugs regulated by the FDA.
- Violations of the law are considered misdemeanors.
- The bill creates a new crime within the Business and Professions Code.
Who is affected
- Sunscreen manufacturers
- Retailers selling sunscreen
- Consumers purchasing sunscreen
Notable changes
- This bill adds a specific prohibition regarding environmental claims for sunscreen products.
- It clarifies that the terms "reef safe" and similar phrases can be misleading to consumers.
- It reinforces existing laws regarding the substantiation of environmental marketing claims.
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yoursRead the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
AB1744:v97#DOCUMENT
Bill Start
| Amended IN Assembly April 09, 2026 |
| Amended IN Assembly March 03, 2026 |
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2025–2026 REGULAR SESSION
Assembly Bill
No. 1744
| Introduced by Assembly Members Addis and Hart |
| February 05, 2026 |
An act to add Section 17580.7 to the Business and Professions Code, relating to environmental advertising.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 1744, as amended, Addis. Environmental advertising: sunscreen.
Under existing law, it is unlawful for any person to make any untruthful, deceptive, or misleading environmental marketing claim, whether explicit or implied. A violation of this requirement is a misdemeanor.
This bill would make it unlawful for a person to represent in advertising or on the label or container of any sunscreen product, as specified, sold in the state, that the product is “reef safe,” “reef friendly,” “ocean safe,” “marine safe,” or any other term implying “ocean friendly,” “marine conscious,” “reef conscious,” or a similar term or phrase likely to cause a reasonable consumer to believe that the product does not harm marine ecosystems unless the product is free of chemical ultraviolet filters, as specified. A violation of the bill would be a misdemeanor. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES
Bill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Section 17580.7 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:
17580.7.
(a) It is unlawful for a person to represent in advertising or on the label or container of any sunscreen product sold in the state that the product is “reef safe,” “reef friendly,” “ocean safe,” “marine safe,” or any other term implying “ocean friendly,” “marine conscious,” “reef conscious,” or a similar term or phrase likely to cause a reasonable consumer to believe that the product does not harm marine ecosystems unless the product does not contain any chemical ultraviolet filters, including, but not limited to, all of the following:
(1) Avobenzone (CAS 70356-09-1).
(2) Homosalate (CAS 118-56-9).
(3) Octinoxate (CAS 5466-77-3).
(4) Octisalate (CAS 118-60-5).
(5) Octocrylene (CAS 6197-30-4).
(6) Oxybenzone (CAS 131-57-7).
(b) For purposes of this section, “sunscreen product” includes any over-the-counter drug regulated by the United States Food and Drug Administration that is intended to protect users from ultraviolet radiation, including, but not limited to, lotions, sprays, sticks, gels, and solids.
(c) Nothing in this section shall imply a person is exempt from the requirements of Section 17580 or 17580.5 related to substantiation of environmental marketing claims.
SEC. 2.
No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution.