AB 1883
Workplace surveillance tools.
Vote required
Majority
Fiscal committee
No
Appropriation
No
Current location
Appropriations
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take action- Introduced
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill regulates the use of workplace surveillance tools in California, aiming to protect workers' privacy and prevent discriminatory practices. It prohibits employers from using these tools for purposes like preventing compliance with labor laws, making inferences about workers’ emotional states or protected characteristics, or collecting neural data. The bill also restricts the use of facial recognition technology for disciplinary actions and requires employers to seek exceptions for safety-related surveillance or compliance with federal regulations. It establishes enforcement mechanisms and penalties for violations.
Key provisions
- Prohibits employers from using workplace surveillance tools for purposes like preventing compliance with labor laws or inferring protected characteristics.
- Specifically prohibits the use of facial recognition technology for firing or disciplinary actions.
- Restricts the collection of neural data and inferences based on gait or emotional state.
- Requires employers to obtain exceptions for safety-related surveillance or compliance with federal regulations.
- Establishes a penalty of up to $500 for each violation of the bill's provisions.
- Authorizes workers to bring civil actions for violations.
- Defines key terms related to workplace surveillance, including ‘artificial intelligence’ and ‘employer’.
- Provides for enforcement by the Labor Commissioner and public prosecutors.
Who is affected
- Employers (including governmental entities)
- Employees
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yoursRead the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
AB1883:v95#DOCUMENT
Bill Start
| Amended IN Senate July 02, 2026 |
| Amended IN Assembly May 18, 2026 |
| Amended IN Assembly April 13, 2026 |
| Amended IN Assembly March 12, 2026 |
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2025–2026 REGULAR SESSION
Assembly Bill
No. 1883
| Introduced by Assembly Member Bryan |
| February 12, 2026 |
An act to add Part 5.8 (commencing with Section 1580) to Division 2 of the Labor Code, relating to employment.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 1883, as amended, Bryan. Workplace surveillance tools.
Existing law establishes the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement within the Department of Industrial Relations. Existing law authorizes the division, which is headed by the Labor Commissioner, to enforce the Labor Code and all labor laws of the state, the enforcement of which is not specifically vested in any other officer, board, or commission.
This bill would generally regulate the use of workplace surveillance tools and an employer’s use of worker data. The bill would prohibit an employer from using a workplace surveillance tool on workers for various purposes, including preventing compliance with laws or regulations, inferring information about workers engaging in a protected activity, making inferences about an individual’s emotional state or based on their gait, or collecting neural data. The bill would prohibit an employer from using facial recognition technology to make inferences about a worker for firing, deactivation, or disciplinary purposes. The bill would, with certain exceptions, also prohibit an employer from using a workplace surveillance tool to infer specified categories of information about a worker, including, among others, their veteran status, ancestral history, religious beliefs, or disability status.
This bill would, with certain exceptions, prohibit an employer from using a workplace surveillance tool that uses artificial intelligence to, among other things, collect neural data or recognize an individual’s emotional state. The bill would define an employer to include a governmental entity, including, among other entities, charter cities and the University of California.
This bill would require the Labor Commissioner to enforce the bill’s provisions, would authorize an employee to bring a civil action for specified remedies for a violation of the bill’s provisions, and would authorize a public prosecutor to enforce the provisions. The bill would subject an employer who violates the bill’s provisions to a civil penalty of up to $500 for each violation. The bill would define various terms for purposes of its provisions.
This bill would exempt from its provisions the use of a workplace artificial intelligence tool or a workplace surveillance tool to the extent that its use is required by, to ensure safety or is reasonably necessary to comply with, a federal statute, federal regulation, or binding federal contract relating to the development of aircraft for use in the national airspace or the development of products or services for national security, military, space, or defense purposes.
The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO
Bill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Part 5.8 (commencing with Section 1580) is added to Division 2 of the Labor Code, to read:
PART 5.8. Workplace Surveillance Tools
1580.
As used in this part:
(a) “Artificial intelligence” means an engineered or machine-based system that varies in its level of autonomy and that can, for explicit or implicit objectives, infer from the input it receives how to generate outputs that can influence physical or virtual environments.
(a)
(b) (1) “Employer” means a person or governmental entity that directly or indirectly, or through an agent or any other person, employs or exercises control over the wages, benefits, other compensation, hours, working conditions, access to work or job opportunities, or other terms or conditions of employment, of any worker, including all branches of state government, and all cities, counties, cities and counties, charter cities, charter counties, special districts, including transit districts, the University of California, the California State University, community college districts, school districts, or any other state or local governmental entity.
(2) “Employer” includes an employer’s labor contractor.
(b)“Facial recognition technology” means any technology that analyzes a worker’s facial features to identify, verify, or track a worker in a still or video image.
(c) “Neural data” means information that is generated by measuring the activity of a worker’s central or peripheral nervous system, and that is not inferred from nonneural information.
(d) “Public prosecutor” has the same meaning as defined in Section 180.
(e) “Worker” means a natural person, an employee of, or an independent contractor providing service to, or through, a business or a state or local governmental entity in a workplace.
(f) “Workplace surveillance tool” means any system, application, instrument, or device that collects or facilitates the collection of worker data, activities, communications, actions, biometrics, or behaviors by means other than direct observation by a person, including, but not limited to, video or audio surveillance, continuous incremental time-tracking tools, geolocation, electromagnetic tracking, photoelectronic tracking, or that utilizes a photo-optical system or other means.
1581.
(a) (1)An employer shall not use a workplace surveillance tool on workers to do any of the following: that uses artificial intelligence on workers that is capable of either of the following:
(A)Prevent compliance with or violate any federal, state, or local labor, occupational health and safety, employment, or civil rights laws or regulations.
(B)Infer information about workers engaging in activity protected by state or federal law.
(C)Make inferences about
(1) Recognizing, or making inferences or predictions about, an individual’s emotional state.
(D)Make inferences about an individual based on their gait.
(E)Collect
(2) Collecting neural data.
(2)An employer shall not use facial recognition technology to make inferences about a worker for firing, deactivation, or disciplinary purposes.
(3)An employer shall not use a workplace surveillance tool to infer a worker’s protected status under Section 12940 of the Government Code.
(b) This section does not prohibit an employer from using a workplace surveillance tool to ensure safety, provided that the tool does not incorporate artificial intelligence that makes inferences or predictions based on a worker’s emotional, gait, neural data, protected status under Section 12940 of the Government Code, or about activity protected by state or federal law. or otherwise if it does not meet the specifications in subdivision (a).
1582.
(a) The Labor Commissioner shall enforce this part, including investigating an alleged violation, and ordering appropriate temporary relief to mitigate a violation or maintain the status quo pending the completion of a full investigation or hearing through the procedures set forth in Section 98, 98.3, 98.7, 98.74, or 1197.1, including issuing a citation against an employer who violates this part and filing a civil action. If a citation is issued, the procedures for issuing, contesting, and enforcing judgments for citations and civil penalties issued by the Labor Commissioner shall be the same as those set out in Section 98.74 or 1197.1, as applicable.
(b) This part may also be enforced by a public prosecutor pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 180) of Division 1.
(c) Alternatively to subdivisions (a) and (b), a worker, or their exclusive representative, who has suffered a violation of this part may bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction for damages caused by the violation.
(d) In any civil action brought pursuant to subdivision (a), (b), or (c), the petitioner may seek appropriate temporary or preliminary injunctive relief, including punitive damages, and reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.
(e) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), in addition to any other remedy, an employer who violates this part may be subject to a penalty of up to five hundred dollars ($500) for each violation.
(2) An employee, the Labor Commissioner, or a public prosecutor may recover a penalty under this part as a statutory penalty paid to the employee or a civil penalty, but not both, for the same violation.
(f) An action brought pursuant to this section may be brought in the superior court in any county in which the violation in question is alleged to have occurred or in which the employer resides.
(g) This part does not preempt any city, county, or city and county ordinance that provides equal or greater protection to workers who are covered by this part.
1583.
(a) This part shall not apply to the use of a workplace artificial intelligence tool or a workplace surveillance tool to the extent that use of the tool is required by, or reasonably necessary to comply with, a federal statute, federal regulation, or binding federal contract does not prohibit the use of a tool relating to any of the following:
(1) The development of aircraft for use in the national airspace.
(2) The development of products or services for national security, military, space, or defense purposes.
(b) The exemption in this section applies only to the operations covered by a federal statute, federal regulation, or binding federal contract outlined in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (a). the use of a tool that is reasonably necessary to comply with a federal statute, federal regulation, or binding federal contract.
SEC. 2.
The Legislature finds and declares that Section 1 of this act adding Part 5.8 (commencing with Section 1580) to Division 2 of the Labor Code addresses a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution. Therefore, Section 1 of this act applies to all cities, including charter cities.