California Environmental Quality Act: surplus land disposal requirements: exemption.
Vote required
Majority
Fiscal committee
No
Appropriation
No
Current location
Local Government
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed Assembly
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to streamline the environmental review process for development projects on surplus land at the former Concord Naval Weapons Station. It exempts land conveyed to local reuse authorities, particularly in accordance with federal base closure agreements, from standard California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements, provided certain conditions are met. Specifically, it allows for a streamlined environmental review process based on existing environmental documents for projects within the designated reuse area, subject to limitations on expansion and affordability requirements. The bill also establishes a process for challenging these exemptions and includes provisions related to general plan reporting and local agency responsibilities.
Key provisions
- Exempts land conveyed by the federal government to local reuse authorities (following specific closure procedures) from CEQA requirements.
- Requires local reuse authorities to include specific information about residential development in their annual general plan reports.
- Allows for the use of existing environmental review documents (CEQA reports) for projects within the Concord Reuse Project Area Plan, subject to certain conditions.
- Limits the time to challenge the application of the exemption to 90 days after a local reuse authority approves a disposition agreement.
- Requires local reuse authorities to report on the status of residential development and affordability requirements.
- Establishes a process for reviewing projects that exceed the limits set in the existing environmental review documents.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours