Water discharge: commercial, industrial, or institutional sites.
Vote required
Majority
Fiscal committee
No
Appropriation
No
Current location
In Floor Process
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill clarifies the definition of ‘commercial, industrial, or institutional site’ (CII site) used in stormwater permits issued by the State Water Resources Control Board and regional boards. It specifies that a CII site is determined by county tax assessor land use codes, excluding residential facilities. The bill also shortens the notice period required for unprotested permit applications to 15 days from the current 20 days.
Key provisions
- Defines ‘commercial, industrial, or institutional site’ (CII site) based on county tax assessor land use codes.
- Excludes residential facilities from the definition of a CII site.
- Requires 15 days’ notice for unprotested permit applications.
- Applies to stormwater discharge permits issued by the State Water Resources Control Board and regional water quality control boards.
- Addresses municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s).
Who is affected
- Businesses
- Industries
- Local governments (through regional water boards)
- Property owners
- Environmental regulators
Notable changes
- Reduces the notice period for unprotested permit applications from 20 days to 15 days.
- Provides a specific definition of ‘commercial, industrial, or institutional site’ based on land use codes.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours