SB 1173
Jury instructions: lesser related offenses.
Vote required
Majority
Fiscal committee
No
Appropriation
No
Current location
Appropriations
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take action- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed Assembly
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill changes California law to allow defendants to request jury instructions on a lesser related offense if certain conditions are met. Specifically, the court must determine the defendant relies on a defense consistent with the lesser offense, the evidence is relevant, and a jury could find the offense less serious than the one charged. The bill also aims to restore a right previously established by the California Supreme Court in People v. Geiger, and updates a section regarding bribery penalties for judicial officers.
Key provisions
- Allows defendants to request jury instructions on a lesser related offense.
- Requires the court to consider if the defendant relies on a defense consistent with the lesser offense.
- Requires the court to determine if evidence of the lesser offense is relevant and admitted.
- Authorizes the judge to find the defendant guilty of the lesser offense if there is no jury.
- Restores a right previously guaranteed by the California Supreme Court in People v. Geiger.
- Updates penalties for judicial officers who accept bribes.
Who is affected
- Criminal defendants
- Prosecutors
- Judges
- Jurors
- The judicial system
Notable changes
- Introduces a mechanism for requesting and receiving jury instructions on lesser related offenses.
- Reaffirms a previous California Supreme Court ruling regarding defendant rights.
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yoursRead the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
SB1173:v98#DOCUMENT
Bill Start
| Amended IN Senate March 23, 2026 |
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2025–2026 REGULAR SESSION
Senate Bill
No. 1173
| Introduced by Senator Caballero |
| February 18, 2026 |
An act to amend Section 93 1159 of the Penal Code, relating to crimes. criminal procedure.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SB 1173, as amended, Caballero. Crimes: bribery. Jury instructions: lesser related offenses.
Existing law authorizes the finder of fact in a criminal prosecution to find the defendant guilty of an offense that is necessarily included in the charged offense. Case law requires the trial court to instruct the jury that it must find the defendant guilty of a necessarily included offense if there is substantial evidence that the defendant is guilty of the necessarily included offense.This bill would require the court, if requested by a defendant, to instruct the jury on a lesser offense, which is closely related to the offense charged, if the court finds that the defendant has relied on a theory of defense consistent with a conviction for the lesser offense, the evidence of the lesser offense is relevant to and admitted for the purpose of establishing guilt of the charged offense, and a basis exists on which the jury could find the offense to be less than charged. The bill would also authorize the judge to find the defendant guilty of the lesser offense if there is no jury. The bill would state the intent of the Legislature that the bill restores rights previously found by the California Supreme Court in People v. Geiger (1984) 35 Cal.3d 510.
Existing law makes it a felony for specified individuals authorized by law to determine a question or controversy to ask, receive, or agree to receive any bribe upon the agreement or understanding that their vote, opinion, or decision upon a matter will be influenced by the bribe.
This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO
Bill Text
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
Section 1159 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
1159.
The (a) A jury, or the a judge if a jury trial is waived, may find the a defendant guilty of any an offense, the commission of which is necessarily included in that with which he the defendant is charged, or of an attempt to commit the offense.
(b) A jury, or a judge if a jury trial is waived, upon request of a defendant, may find the defendant guilty of a lesser offense, the commission of which is closely related to the offense with which the defendant is charged, if the court determines that all of the following conditions are met:(1) The defendant relies on a theory of defense that is consistent with a conviction for the lesser offense.(2) The evidence of the lesser offense is relevant to and admitted for the purpose of establishing whether the defendant is guilty of the charged offense.(3) A basis exists, other than an unexplainable rejection of prosecution evidence, on which the jury could find the offense to be less than that charged.(c) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting subdivision (b) to restore the right of a defendant to receive jury instructions on lesser related offenses as originally guaranteed by the California Supreme Court in People v. Geiger (1984) 35 Cal.3d 510.
SECTION 1.Section 93 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
93.
(a)Every judicial officer, juror, referee, arbitrator, or umpire, and every person authorized by law to hear or determine any question or controversy, who asks, receives, or agrees to receive, any bribe, upon any agreement or understanding that their vote, opinion, or decision upon any matters or question that is or may be brought before them for decision, shall be influenced thereby, is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years and, if no bribe has been actually received, by a restitution fine of not less than two thousand dollars ($2,000) or not more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000) or, if a bribe was actually received, by a restitution fine of at least the actual amount of the bribe received or two thousand dollars ($2,000), whichever is greater, or any larger amount of not more than double the amount of any bribe received or ten thousand dollars ($10,000), whichever is greater.
(b)In imposing a restitution fine under this section, the court shall consider the defendant’s ability to pay the fine.