Public contracts: best value procurement: community college districts.
Vote required
Majority
Fiscal committee
No
Appropriation
No
Current location
Enrolled
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed Assembly
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill allows community college districts in California to use a ‘best value’ procurement method for projects exceeding $1 million, starting in 2030. This method evaluates bids based on a combination of price and qualifications, considering factors like experience, financial stability, and workforce training. Districts must follow specific procedures and submit a report to the Legislature on their use of this method, which will then be repealed in 2031. The bill aims to provide more flexibility in how community colleges procure goods and services while ensuring accountability.
Key provisions
- Community college districts can use the ‘best value’ procurement method for projects over $1 million starting in 2030.
- ‘Best value’ considers factors like experience, financial condition, workforce training, and safety record.
- Districts must establish procedures and guidelines for evaluating bids using the ‘best value’ method.
- Districts must submit a report to the Legislature on their use of the ‘best value’ method by January 1, 2030.
- If a selected bidder fails to execute a contract, the district can award it to the next highest ‘best value’ bidder.
- Retention proceeds withheld from the selected contractor are limited to 5% if a performance bond is required.
- Bidders must demonstrate a commitment to using a skilled and trained workforce.
- The bill will be repealed on January 1, 2031.
Who is affected
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours