California Environmental Quality Act.
Vote required
Majority
Fiscal committee
No
Appropriation
No
Current location
Rules
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed Assembly
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill makes minor revisions to the language of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). CEQA requires government agencies to assess the environmental impact of projects and determine if they will significantly harm the environment. The bill updates the legislative findings and declarations that support CEQA’s goals of protecting California’s environment and ensuring a healthy environment for its residents. It clarifies the intent of the state legislature regarding environmental regulation.
Key provisions
- Updates legislative findings and declarations related to environmental quality.
- Revises the statement of intent regarding state agency regulation of activities affecting the environment.
- Amends Section 21000 of the Public Resources Code.
- Reinforces the state’s commitment to maintaining a quality environment.
- Highlights the importance of ecological systems and the general welfare of Californians.
- Emphasizes the need to prevent environmental damage.
- Recognizes the responsibility of citizens in preserving the environment.
- Calls for coordinated efforts to manage natural resources and control pollution.
Who is affected
- State government agencies
- Private individuals
- Corporations
- Public agencies
- California residents
Notable changes
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours