State highways: report: southeast Los Angeles County.
Vote required
Majority
Fiscal committee
No
Appropriation
No
Current location
Transportation
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill requires the California Department of Transportation to prepare and submit a report to the Legislature and post it online by February 1, 2028. The report will assess the department’s services and infrastructure needs in the southeast portion of Los Angeles County. It also mandates a public comment period and encourages outreach with various stakeholders, including local governments and community organizations.
Key provisions
- Requires the Department of Transportation to prepare a report on state highway infrastructure needs in southeast Los Angeles County.
- Mandates submission of the report to the Legislature and posting on the department’s website.
- Requires a public comment period on the report's topic.
- Encourages outreach with stakeholders such as local governments and community organizations.
- Requires the department to hold a public workshop in the affected area.
- Updates Section 91.1 of the Streets and Highways Code.
- Addresses the necessity of a special statute for the County of Los Angeles.
Who is affected
- California Department of Transportation
- California Transportation Commission
- Southeast Los Angeles County residents
- Local governments in Los Angeles County
- Community-based organizations
Notable changes
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours