State civil service: employment disqualification: disclosure.
Vote required
Majority
Fiscal committee
No
Appropriation
No
Current location
Labor, Public Employment and Retirement
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed Assembly
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill amends California state employment law to require applicants for state jobs to disclose if they have previously been employed by the United States Department of Homeland Security or its component agencies, such as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). It also adds a new requirement for employment forms to inquire about agreements prohibiting subsequent state employment. The bill’s provisions are contingent on a judicial determination that they are not unconstitutional.
Key provisions
- Requires state employment applications to ask about prior employment with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security or its agencies.
- Requires state employment applications to ask about agreements prohibiting subsequent state employment.
- Disqualifies individuals employed by ICE between January 20, 2025, and January 20, 2029, from state employment.
- Employment forms must require disclosure of prior agreements prohibiting subsequent state employment.
- The bill’s provisions are contingent on a judicial determination that they are not unconstitutional.
- The bill makes the provisions of the act severable.
Who is affected
- Applicants for state employment
- State government agencies
- Individuals formerly employed by the United States Department of Homeland Security
- Individuals formerly employed by Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours