Mobilehome parks: federally approved housing programs: compliance with state and local laws.
Vote required
Majority
Fiscal committee
No
Appropriation
No
Current location
Enrolled
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill clarifies that mobilehome park operators and owners must comply with both federal housing laws and applicable state and local laws. Specifically, if they fail to meet federal requirements related to federally approved housing programs, like the Housing for Older Persons Act, they must also ensure ongoing compliance with California laws, including the Mobilehome Residency Law. Local agencies are authorized to conduct age verification if a park operator fails to do so, and to access records to verify age.
Key provisions
- Requires mobilehome park operators/owners to comply with both federal and state/local laws.
- Mandates ongoing compliance with state laws if federal requirements are not met.
- Authorizes local agencies to conduct age verification if operators fail to do so.
- Grants local agencies the right to access and inspect records for age verification.
- Specifically mentions compliance with the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995.
Who is affected
- Mobilehome park operators
- Mobilehome park owners
- Local government agencies
- Mobilehome residents
- Housing providers
Notable changes
- Establishes a clear obligation for operators to comply with both federal and state laws.
- Provides local agencies with authority to conduct age verification in certain circumstances.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours