Torts: defenses; immunity; provide for individual reacting to a riot. Amends 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.101 - 600.9947) by adding sec. 2922d.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill creates a legal defense for individuals who acted in self-defense during a riot. It states that an individual is not liable for damages or injuries if their actions were a direct response to another person’s actions that instigated the riot. The definition of ‘riot’ is tied to conduct defined under a specific state law regarding unlawful assemblies. This bill aims to clarify legal protections for those defending themselves in chaotic situations.
Key provisions
- Individuals acting in self-defense during a riot are not liable for damages or injuries.
- Liability is waived if the individual's actions stemmed from another person's actions that fueled the riot.
- ‘Riot’ is defined as conduct prohibited under Michigan’s law regarding unlawful assemblies (MCL 752.541).
- This provision amends existing tort law (1961 PA 236).
Who is affected
- Individuals
- Potential plaintiffs in civil lawsuits
- Individuals involved in riots
- Property owners
- Potential defendants in civil lawsuits
Notable changes
- Introduces a specific legal defense related to self-defense during riots.
- Links the definition of ‘riot’ to a specific existing state law.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Document of record
- Version
- Senate Introduced Bill
- Published
- Not published in the source record
This version is published only as a document. Open the viewer to read it here, or download the file.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
No sponsors are on record.
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours