Economic development: other; the home rule city act; amend to reflect elimination of the Michigan strategic fund. Amends sec. 4q of 1909 PA 279 (MCL 117.4q). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0631'25
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill amends the Home Rule City Act to eliminate the Michigan Strategic Fund. It establishes a process for cities with a population of 7,500 or more to create administrative hearings bureaus to adjudicate and impose sanctions for blight violations, such as zoning or property maintenance issues. The bureau’s authority is limited, and it cannot impose incarceration or fines exceeding $10,000. The bill also outlines procedures for notices, hearings, and appeals related to blight violations, with specific rules regarding rental inspections and potential penalties for repeat offenders.
Key provisions
- Establishes administrative hearings bureaus for blight violations in qualifying cities.
- Defines types of ordinances considered blight violations (e.g., zoning, building maintenance).
- Sets limits on the bureau’s authority, including fines and inability to impose incarceration.
- Outlines procedures for issuing violation notices and conducting hearings.
- Specifies rules regarding rental inspections and when blight violation notices can be issued.
- Requires hearing officers to complete a formal training program.
- Details the process for appealing a hearing officer’s decision to the circuit court.
- Establishes penalties for failure to correct blight violations, including potential misdemeanor charges and fines.
Who is affected
- Cities with a population of 7,500 or more
- Property owners subject to blight ordinances
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Document of record
- Version
- Senate Introduced Bill
- Published
- Not published in the source record
This version is published only as a document. Open the viewer to read it here, or download the file.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
No sponsors are on record.
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours