Elections: petitions; signature requirements for qualifying petitions; modify. Amends sec. 544f of 1954 PA 116 (MCL 168.544f).
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill modifies the requirements for collecting signatures on nominating petitions for Michigan elections. It establishes a tiered system based on the population of the district, specifying the minimum and maximum number of signatures needed for partisan, non-partisan, and qualifying petitions. The changes will go into effect on January 1, 2027.
Key provisions
- Sets minimum and maximum signature requirements for partisan petitions based on district population.
- Sets minimum and maximum signature requirements for non-partisan petitions based on district population.
- Sets minimum and maximum signature requirements for qualifying petitions based on district population.
- The signature thresholds are determined using the most recent federal decennial census data.
- The bill applies to petitions for local elections.
- The act takes effect on January 1, 2027.
Who is affected
- Candidates running for office
- Political parties
- Voters in Michigan
- Election officials
- Local government officials
Notable changes
- Updates the signature requirements outlined in section 544f of the Michigan Election Law.
- Introduces a population-based system for determining signature thresholds.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Document of record
- Version
- Senate Introduced Bill
- Published
- Not published in the source record
This version is published only as a document. Open the viewer to read it here, or download the file.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
No sponsors are on record.
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours