Communications: video services; definition of video service; modify. Amends sec. 1 of 2006 PA 480 (MCL 484.3301).
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill clarifies the definition of ‘video service’ under Michigan’s Uniform Video Services Local Franchise Act. It defines key terms related to video services, including cable operator, cable service, IPTV, and incumbent video provider, drawing from federal definitions. The bill also establishes a ‘low-income household’ definition and clarifies the scope of video service to exclude certain types of video content, such as commercial mobile service video and direct-to-home satellite services.
Key provisions
- Defines ‘video service’ as video programming, cable services, IPTV, or OVS.
- Establishes definitions for terms like ‘cable operator,’ ‘cable service,’ ‘IPTV,’ and ‘OVS’ using federal definitions.
- Defines ‘low-income household’ based on average annual household income.
- Specifies that ‘video service’ excludes certain video content types.
- Identifies ‘incumbent video provider’ as a cable operator or telecommunication provider serving existing telephone exchange boundaries.
- Defines ‘franchising entity’ as the local government where video services are offered.
- Clarifies that ‘public rights-of-way’ include areas dedicated for compatible uses.
- Defines ‘video service provider’ as a person authorized to provide video service.
Who is affected
- Video service providers
- Local governments (cities, villages, townships)
- Cable operators
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Document of record
- Version
- Senate Introduced Bill
- Published
- Not published in the source record
This version is published only as a document. Open the viewer to read it here, or download the file.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
No sponsors are on record.
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours