A Resolution directing the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to conduct a study and issue a report on the current status, management and implementation of modernization practices for the Department of Transportation.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This resolution directs the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to conduct a study and produce a report on how the Department of Transportation (PennDOT) is currently managing and implementing modernization practices. The study will assess procurement methods, electronic transactions, engineering district structures, and road/bridge funding options. It also requires the committee to gather input from local communities and experts to develop recommendations for improving PennDOT’s modernization efforts, focusing on cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and economic growth.
Key provisions
- Assess existing procurement methods for PennDOT.
- Identify improvements in electronic transactions and transition from paper-based systems.
- Evaluate Department of Transportation Engineering Districts and recommend structural changes.
- Explore cost-effective road and bridge funding options.
- Engage with local communities, stakeholders, and experts during the study.
- Develop recommendations for enhancing PennDOT modernization, considering cost-effectiveness and sustainability.
- Submit a report to the House of Representatives within 12 months.
Who is affected
- Department of Transportation (PennDOT)
- Pennsylvania Residents
- Local Communities
- Transportation Stakeholders
- Legislative Budget and Finance Committee
Notable changes
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Document of record
- Version
- Pn 2327 Html
- Published
- Not published in the source record
This version is published only as a document. Open the viewer to read it here, or download the file.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
9 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
David Zimmerman
R. Lee James
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours