A Resolution directing the Joint State Government Commission to study the costs and benefits of continued membership in the PJM Interconnection.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This resolution directs the Joint State Government Commission to study the costs and benefits of Pennsylvania’s continued membership in the PJM Interconnection. The study will examine financial costs, reliability risks, and potential benefits, including access to electricity markets and economic development. Recent increases in PJM capacity auction prices have prompted concerns about customer costs, leading to a state-led effort to understand the long-term implications of this membership.
Key provisions
- Assess the financial costs and reliability risks associated with PJM membership.
- Analyze potential financial and reliability benefits of PJM membership.
- Evaluate the impact of PJM membership on various stakeholders (residential, commercial, and industrial customers).
- Require a study initiated within 30 days and a final report published within 180 days.
- Include public hearings and opportunities for written comments.
- Ensure all study data and findings are publicly accessible.
- The report must include detailed findings, recommendations, and a summary of public input.
Who is affected
- Pennsylvania residents
- Pennsylvania businesses (residential, commercial, and industrial)
- Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
- PJM Interconnection
- Electric power plant owners
Notable changes
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Document of record
- Version
- Pn 1304 Html
- Published
- Not published in the source record
This version is published only as a document. Open the viewer to read it here, or download the file.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
9 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Christine Tartaglione
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours