An Act to close the achievement gap by addressing disparities in children's vision
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to reduce disparities in children’s vision and, consequently, close the achievement gap. It seeks to improve access to and quality of child eye care services in Massachusetts. The legislation focuses on addressing issues that contribute to vision problems in children and ensuring they receive the necessary support to succeed academically. By improving children’s vision, the bill intends to positively impact their educational outcomes.
Key provisions
- Requires the Department of Public Health to develop guidelines for child eye care.
- Establishes a grant program to support local health centers in providing eye care services to children.
- Promotes vision screenings for children in schools and other settings.
- Encourages collaboration between healthcare providers and schools to address vision-related issues.
- Focuses on addressing disparities in access to eye care for underserved populations.
Who is affected
- Children in Massachusetts
- Families of children
- Schools and school districts
- Healthcare providers
- Massachusetts Department of Public Health
Notable changes
- The bill establishes a framework for improving child eye care services statewide.
- It prioritizes addressing disparities in access to vision care.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
6 on record
Primary sponsor
Michael O. Moore
Cosponsors
James B. Eldridge
Joanne M. Comerford
Michael O. Moore
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours