Proposal for a legislative amendment to the Constitution prohibiting eminent domain takings
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This proposed constitutional amendment seeks to permanently prevent the state of Massachusetts from using eminent domain to seize private property, even for public use. It would establish a clear prohibition against the government’s ability to take property through this process. The amendment aims to strengthen property rights and limit the government’s power to redistribute land. This proposal has been repeatedly considered in the legislature over the past decade.
Key provisions
- Prohibits the state government from using eminent domain.
- Applies to all future property takings.
- Would require a constitutional amendment to be ratified.
- Seeks to protect private property rights.
- Addresses concerns about government overreach.
- Prevents the use of eminent domain for economic development projects.
- Ensures property owners have greater protection against involuntary property loss.
Who is affected
- Property owners in Massachusetts
- Businesses located in Massachusetts
- The Massachusetts government
- Developers and landowners
- Citizens of Massachusetts
Notable changes
- Currently, Massachusetts law allows for eminent domain under certain circumstances.
- This amendment would fundamentally alter the legal framework surrounding property takings.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
7 on record
Primary sponsor
Bradley H. Jones Jr.
Cosponsors
Bradley H. Jones Jr.
Kimberly N. Ferguson
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours