An Act improving juvenile justice data collection
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to enhance data collection practices within the Massachusetts juvenile justice system. It seeks to improve the accuracy and comprehensiveness of information gathered regarding juvenile offenders and the services they receive. The goal is to provide a more detailed understanding of the system’s operations and outcomes, ultimately supporting data-driven decision-making and potentially leading to more effective interventions. This legislation builds upon previous efforts to improve juvenile justice data collection in the state.
Key provisions
- Requires more detailed data collection on juvenile offenders.
- Focuses on collecting data related to services provided to juveniles.
- Aims to improve the quality and consistency of data reported.
- Establishes standards for data reporting within the juvenile justice system.
- Supports analysis of juvenile justice system trends and outcomes.
Who is affected
- Juvenile offenders
- Juvenile justice system personnel
- Massachusetts state government
- Court systems
- Probation departments
Notable changes
- This bill represents an ongoing effort to improve data collection in the juvenile justice system, building on previous similar legislation.
- It likely includes provisions for standardized data reporting formats and definitions.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
5 on record
Primary sponsor
Cynthia Stone Creem
Cosponsors
Cynthia Stone Creem
James B. Eldridge
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours