An Act furthering enrollment preferences for high need students
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to establish enrollment preferences for students identified as ‘high need’ at Commonwealth charter schools. It seeks to prioritize these students when determining admission, ensuring access to charter school opportunities for those facing significant challenges. The bill intends to create a more equitable system for accessing charter schools, particularly for students from disadvantaged backgrounds. This will be achieved through a defined process for identifying and prioritizing high-need students.
Key provisions
- Establishes a definition of ‘high need’ students.
- Requires charter schools to consider enrollment preferences for high-need students.
- Specifies a process for identifying and documenting students as ‘high need’.
- Mandates charter schools to develop and implement enrollment plans that prioritize these students.
- Creates a reporting requirement for charter schools regarding enrollment data.
Who is affected
- Students identified as ‘high need’
- Commonwealth charter schools
- Parents and guardians of ‘high need’ students
- Charter school admissions committees
- The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Notable changes
- Introduces a formal system for prioritizing enrollment at charter schools based on student need.
- May require charter schools to adjust their admissions policies.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
4 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours