An Act to ensure the responsible use of advanced robotic technologies
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to establish guidelines for the responsible development and deployment of advanced robotic technologies in Massachusetts. It seeks to address potential ethical, social, and economic impacts associated with these technologies, focusing on ensuring safety, fairness, and accountability. The bill intends to foster a framework that promotes innovation while mitigating risks and protecting the public interest. It is currently under consideration by the Massachusetts legislature.
Key provisions
- Establish a task force to study the implications of advanced robotics.
- Develop recommendations for ethical guidelines and standards for robotic technology.
- Explore potential impacts on workforce development and job displacement.
- Consider data privacy and security concerns related to robotic systems.
- Investigate the use of robotics in various sectors, including healthcare, transportation, and manufacturing.
- Promote public awareness and education about robotics.
- Require transparency in the development and deployment of robotic technologies.
- Address potential biases in robotic algorithms and decision-making.
Who is affected
- Businesses utilizing robotics
- Workers in industries impacted by robotics
- The general public
- Massachusetts residents
- Technology developers
Notable changes
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Patricia A. Duffy
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours