An Act to establish standards for the pole attachment process to facilitate the construction of broadband networks
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to improve the process for broadband companies to access utility poles in Massachusetts, making it easier and faster to build out new networks. Currently, regulations can make it difficult and costly for internet providers to attach equipment to existing poles. The bill seeks to establish clear standards and procedures for pole attachment, streamlining the process and promoting broadband expansion throughout the state. This would ultimately benefit consumers by increasing access to reliable internet service.
Key provisions
- Establishes standards for pole attachment agreements.
- Requires utility companies to provide broadband providers with access to poles.
- Sets timelines for responding to requests for pole attachment.
- Creates a process for resolving disputes related to pole attachment.
- Promotes transparency in the pole attachment process.
- Addresses costs associated with pole attachment.
Who is affected
- Broadband internet service providers
- Utility companies
- Telecommunications companies
- Consumers in Massachusetts
- The State of Massachusetts
Notable changes
- The bill seeks to simplify and standardize the existing pole attachment process.
- It aims to reduce the regulatory barriers that currently hinder broadband deployment.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
4 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours