An Act relative to protecting the residents of the Commonwealth from dangerous persons
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to establish a framework for addressing concerns about individuals deemed ‘dangerous persons’ within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. It seeks to create a process for determining dangerousness and potentially restricting an individual’s liberty, focusing on ensuring public safety. The legislation intends to provide a more structured approach to handling situations involving individuals posing a risk to the community. It is part of a series of bills addressing similar issues.
Key provisions
- Establishes a process for determining when an individual is considered a ‘dangerous person.’
- May involve hearings to assess an individual’s dangerousness.
- Could potentially lead to restrictions on an individual’s liberty.
- Related to existing legislation concerning dangerousness hearings.
- Part of a series of bills addressing similar concerns.
- Addresses concerns about public safety.
- Focuses on establishing a structured approach to handling dangerous individuals.
- Includes a study order (S2886) related to the issue.
Who is affected
- Individuals potentially subject to evaluation for dangerousness.
- Residents of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
- The Judiciary branch.
- Individuals facing potential restrictions on their liberty.
- Community members concerned about public safety
Notable changes
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
4 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours