An Act relative to the environmental protection of Joint Base Cape Cod
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to enhance the environmental protection measures at Joint Base Cape Cod (JBCC). It directs the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to conduct a comprehensive study of the base’s environmental impacts, including potential contamination from firefighting foam. The study will assess risks to local water resources and recommend strategies for mitigation and remediation. The bill also seeks to establish a framework for ongoing monitoring and reporting to ensure the long-term environmental health of the area.
Key provisions
- Requires a comprehensive study of Joint Base Cape Cod’s environmental impacts.
- Focuses on potential contamination from firefighting foam.
- Directs the DEP to assess risks to local water resources.
- Calls for recommendations for mitigation and remediation strategies.
- Mandates ongoing monitoring and reporting.
- Addresses wastewater treatment and disposal in the town of Sandwich (related to S.2732).
Who is affected
- Joint Base Cape Cod
- Residents of Cape Cod
- Department of Environmental Protection
- Local Water Resources
- Town of Sandwich
Notable changes
- Establishes a formal study process to evaluate environmental risks at JBCC.
- Addresses concerns about PFAS contamination from firefighting foam.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
David T. Vieira
Cosponsors
David T. Vieira
Steven George Xiarhos
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours