An Act relative to permitting public corporations to hold remote annual and special meetings
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill would allow public corporations in Massachusetts to hold their annual and special meetings remotely. Currently, many corporations are limited in their ability to conduct these meetings virtually. This legislation aims to modernize meeting practices and provide greater flexibility for businesses while maintaining appropriate oversight. It seeks to align Massachusetts law with broader trends in corporate governance.
Key provisions
- Authorizes public corporations to hold remote annual and special meetings.
- Specifies requirements for remote meetings, including security measures.
- Allows for hybrid meeting formats (in-person and remote participation).
- Addresses quorum requirements for remote meetings.
- Requires corporations to provide reasonable access to remote meetings for shareholders.
- Establishes guidelines for recording and distributing remote meetings.
- Defines terms related to remote meetings for legal clarity.
Who is affected
- Public corporations operating in Massachusetts
- Shareholders of public corporations
- Corporate boards of directors
- Massachusetts state government (regarding corporate regulations)
- Legal professionals advising corporations
Notable changes
- Creates a legal framework for remote annual and special meetings for public corporations.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
6 on record
Primary sponsor
Bradley H. Jones Jr.
Cosponsors
Bradley H. Jones Jr.
Kimberly N. Ferguson
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours