An Act relative to certain retirement benefits for the surviving spouse of a state police officer injured in the line of duty
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to increase retirement benefits for the surviving spouse of a Massachusetts State Police officer who was injured while serving in the line of duty. It seeks to clarify and potentially expand the existing benefits available to these spouses, ensuring they receive adequate support following the loss of their partner. The bill was introduced in response to a specific case involving Felicia O’Connor, the surviving spouse of a retired State Police officer.
Key provisions
- Expands retirement benefits for surviving spouses of state police officers injured in the line of duty.
- Addresses potential inconsistencies in the current benefit system.
- Specifically references the case of Felicia O’Connor to highlight the need for reform.
- May clarify eligibility requirements for certain benefits.
- Ensures benefits are aligned with the needs of surviving spouses.
Who is affected
- Surviving spouses of Massachusetts State Police officers
- Massachusetts State Police
- Families of law enforcement personnel
- State Retirement Board
Notable changes
- Potential adjustments to existing retirement benefit formulas.
- Clarification of eligibility criteria for benefits.
- Addresses a specific case to demonstrate the need for legislative action.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
2 on record
Primary sponsor
Kathleen R. LaNatra
Cosponsor
Kathleen R. LaNatra
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours