An Act to clarify host community agreement retroactivity
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill addresses how existing host community agreements related to cannabis businesses in Massachusetts are interpreted when looking back at agreements made before the current regulations. It aims to clarify that these agreements should be evaluated under the current cannabis laws and regulations, even if they were initially established under older rules. The bill seeks to ensure that host communities have the same protections and rights as those afforded by current cannabis legislation. Essentially, it retroactively applies current cannabis law to host community agreements.
Key provisions
- Clarifies that existing host community agreements are subject to current Massachusetts cannabis regulations.
- Specifies that current regulations apply retroactively to host community agreements.
- Aims to ensure host communities receive the same protections as those under current law.
- Addresses the interpretation of host community agreements established prior to the current cannabis framework.
Who is affected
- Cannabis businesses
- Host communities
- The Cannabis Control Commission
- Local governments
- Residents of host communities
Notable changes
- Retroactively applies current cannabis regulations to existing host community agreements.
- Updates the legal framework for host community agreements in the cannabis industry.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
2 on record
Primary sponsor
David M. Rogers
Cosponsor
David M. Rogers
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours