An Act relative to the expungement of convictions for marijuana possession
Take action
Take a stance or write a position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill would allow individuals in Massachusetts with prior convictions for marijuana possession to petition the court to have those convictions expunged from their records. It aims to provide a pathway for people with past marijuana offenses to move forward with their lives and employment opportunities. The bill seeks to address inequities created by past marijuana laws and promote fairness in the justice system. It establishes a process for individuals to apply for expungement, potentially restoring rights and reducing barriers to accessing housing, employment, and other services.
Key provisions
- Establishes a process for individuals to petition for expungement of marijuana possession convictions.
- Allows for the expungement of convictions for offenses involving less than 3 ounces of marijuana.
- Creates a registry to track expungements.
- Specifies criteria for determining eligibility for expungement.
- Outlines the procedures for the expungement process.
- Provides for a timeline for the completion of expungement petitions.
Who is affected
- Individuals with prior marijuana possession convictions in Massachusetts.
- Former marijuana offenders.
- Legal professionals involved in expungement proceedings.
- The Massachusetts court system.
- Individuals seeking employment or housing.
Notable changes
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
2 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours