An Act relative to privileged communications in defamation actions
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill addresses the concept of ‘privileged communications’ in cases involving defamation lawsuits. It seeks to clarify and potentially expand the protections afforded to communications considered privileged, particularly in situations where individuals seek advice from legal counsel or other professionals. The goal is to ensure that these communications cannot be used as evidence against someone in a defamation claim, thereby safeguarding freedom of expression and the ability to seek legal guidance without fear of litigation.
Key provisions
- Defines ‘privileged communications’ within the context of defamation actions.
- Expands the scope of communications considered privileged to include consultations with legal professionals.
- Addresses the use of privileged communications in determining the truth of statements made.
- Clarifies the application of privilege to communications between individuals and their labor organizations.
Who is affected
- Individuals
- Legal professionals (lawyers, etc.)
- Media outlets
- Businesses
- Labor organizations
Notable changes
- The bill aims to provide clearer guidelines on what constitutes a ‘privileged communication’.
- It potentially strengthens protections for communications seeking legal advice.
- It includes provisions related to labor organizations and privileged communications.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
6 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Meghan K. Kilcoyne
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours