An Act relative to ensuring fairness and equity in the assessment of the value of property
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to improve fairness and equity in how property values are assessed for tax purposes in Massachusetts. It seeks to ensure that property assessments are accurate and reflect the true market value of properties, potentially addressing concerns about disparities in assessments across different communities. The bill is intended to promote transparency and consistency in the assessment process. It has been repeatedly referred to committees and hearings over several legislative sessions, indicating ongoing consideration of these issues.
Key provisions
- Requires assessors to use consistent and transparent methods for property valuation.
- Establishes procedures for property owners to challenge their assessments.
- Mandates regular reviews of assessment practices to ensure accuracy.
- Promotes training and professional development for assessors.
- Addresses potential biases in the assessment process.
- Requires the Department of Revenue to provide data and resources to support fair assessments.
- Focuses on ensuring assessments reflect current market conditions.
- Establishes a process for resolving disputes between property owners and assessors.
Who is affected
- Property owners
- Local assessors
- Municipal governments
- Taxpayers
- The Department of Revenue
Notable changes
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
5 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Michael D. Brady
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours