An Act providing equity and fairness to POST-certified police officers disabled by cardiac disease
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to ensure that POST-certified police officers who become disabled due to cardiac disease receive equitable treatment under Massachusetts’ heart law. Specifically, it seeks to establish a presumption that cardiac conditions sustained while serving as a police officer are work-related, potentially qualifying them for benefits. The bill builds upon existing legislation to address disparities in benefits for this specific group of public safety personnel. It seeks to provide fairness and recognition for officers facing health challenges due to their service.
Key provisions
- Establishes a presumption that cardiac disease is work-related for POST-certified police officers.
- Applies to police officers disabled by cardiac disease.
- Aims to align with existing Massachusetts ‘heart law’ provisions.
- Addresses potential inequities in benefits for this group of officers.
- Related to the broader heart law that provides benefits to public safety personnel with certain health conditions.
Who is affected
- POST-certified police officers
- Massachusetts police officers
- Individuals with cardiac disease
- Public safety personnel
Notable changes
- Creates a specific presumption for cardiac disease related to police work.
- Expands the scope of the heart law to include police officers.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
76 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Bradley H. Jones Jr.
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours