An Act relative to protecting Massachusetts residents against federal government surveillance
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill seeks to limit the ability of federal criminal justice agencies to access personal data of Massachusetts residents. It aims to protect privacy by requiring agencies to demonstrate a specific and substantial need before requesting such data. The bill also calls for a study on the impact of federal surveillance on Massachusetts residents and their data. It intends to increase transparency and accountability in data sharing practices.
Key provisions
- Requires federal criminal justice agencies to demonstrate a substantial need before accessing personal data of Massachusetts residents.
- Establishes a process for Massachusetts residents to challenge requests for their data.
- Directs the Public Safety and Homeland Security Committee to study the impact of federal surveillance on the state.
- Promotes transparency regarding data sharing practices between federal agencies and Massachusetts residents.
- Addresses data access by criminal justice agencies.
Who is affected
- Massachusetts residents
- Federal criminal justice agencies
- The Public Safety and Homeland Security Committee
Notable changes
- Introduces requirements for demonstrating a substantial need for data access.
- Creates a mechanism for residents to contest data requests.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
5 on record
Primary sponsor
David M. Rogers
Cosponsors
David M. Rogers
Patrick Joseph Kearney
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours