An Act to improve municipal equity within the emergency assistance shelter program
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to address inequities in the distribution of emergency assistance shelter placements across Massachusetts municipalities. Currently, some communities receive a disproportionately high number of individuals seeking shelter, while others receive fewer. The bill seeks to establish a more equitable system for allocating shelter placements, ensuring that all municipalities have access to the resources needed to support those experiencing homelessness. It will likely involve a review and potential adjustment of the criteria used to determine shelter placements.
Key provisions
- Requires a study of current shelter placement distribution across Massachusetts.
- The study will assess whether the current system leads to inequitable outcomes for municipalities.
- The study will identify factors contributing to disparities in shelter placements.
- The study will recommend strategies to promote greater equity in shelter allocation.
Who is affected
- Massachusetts municipalities
- Individuals seeking emergency shelter
- Housing authorities
- The Department of Housing and Community Development
Notable changes
- The bill mandates a study to examine existing shelter placement practices.
- The study’s findings will inform potential adjustments to the allocation process.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
2 on record
Primary sponsor
Michael J. Finn
Cosponsor
Michael J. Finn
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours