An Act ensuring efficient and effective implementation of behavioral health reform
Take action
Take a stance or write a position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to improve how behavioral health reforms are put into practice in Massachusetts. It focuses on ensuring that the state’s efforts to address mental health and substance use issues are implemented efficiently and effectively. The bill seeks to streamline processes and improve the overall effectiveness of these programs. It is part of a broader effort to reorganize and improve services within the Department of Mental Health and Human Services.
Key provisions
- Directs the Department of Mental Health to evaluate and improve implementation strategies for behavioral health reform.
- Supports a study order (S2972) related to behavioral health reform.
- References the committee on Health Care Financing for further review.
- Aims to enhance coordination between different behavioral health agencies.
- Focuses on ensuring efficient and effective implementation of existing reforms.
- Related to the Roadmap for Behavioral Health Reform (H.2193).
Who is affected
- Individuals receiving behavioral health services in Massachusetts
- Mental Health agencies
- Substance Use treatment providers
- Department of Mental Health
- Department of Health Care Financing
Notable changes
- The bill is part of a larger effort to reorganize state agencies related to health and human services.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
2 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours