An Act protecting children from addictive social media feeds
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill aims to address concerns about the potential for social media platforms to be addictive for children. It seeks to regulate the design and delivery of social media feeds to reduce their potential to negatively impact young users’ mental and emotional well-being. The legislation proposes measures to limit the use of manipulative techniques and prioritize children’s safety and healthy development on these platforms. It’s part of a broader effort to protect children from harmful online experiences.
Key provisions
- Requires social media platforms to implement measures to reduce addictive design features.
- Potentially limits the use of algorithms that prioritize engagement over user well-being.
- May mandate disclosures about the potential addictive nature of social media feeds.
- Could establish guidelines for age-appropriate content and platform design.
- Focuses on protecting children from manipulative practices used by social media companies.
Who is affected
- Children
- Social media companies
- Parents and guardians
- The technology industry
- Massachusetts residents
Notable changes
- The bill proposes changes to social media platform design and algorithms.
- It could establish new regulations regarding the use of data to personalize social media feeds.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
2 on record
Primary sponsor
William F. MacGregor
Cosponsor
William F. MacGregor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours