testimony; disciplinary action; prohibition
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill changes the process for appealing disciplinary actions taken against Arizona law enforcement officers. It requires greater cooperation and information sharing between the officer and their employer during the appeal process, including providing witnesses and documents. The bill also allows for a change of hearing officer if one is deemed biased and outlines rules for retroactive compensation if an officer wins an appeal and was terminated. Finally, it mandates a final disposition report be provided to the law enforcement agency.
Key provisions
- Requires law enforcement officers and employers to share investigative files and witness information during appeals.
- Allows for a change of hearing officer if a biased officer is assigned.
- Establishes rules for retroactive compensation for officers who win appeals and were terminated.
- Mandates a final disposition report be provided to the initiating law enforcement agency.
- Clarifies the burden of proof in disciplinary appeal cases.
- Outlines circumstances where disciplinary action can be amended or reversed.
- Specifies that hearings are open to the public, with limited exceptions for legal advice and deliberations.
- Addresses the disclosure of information during the appeal process to prevent misuse.
Who is affected
- Law enforcement officers in Arizona
- Employers of law enforcement officers in Arizona
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours