vulnerable adults; theft; definitions
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill amends Arizona’s theft laws to specifically address instances where vulnerable adults are targeted. It defines ‘theft’ to include situations where a person knowingly takes control of a vulnerable adult’s property while in a position of trust, even if a gift is involved. The bill also clarifies definitions related to vulnerable adults, ferrous and nonferrous metals, and establishes felony classifications based on the value of stolen property, with enhanced penalties for larger thefts involving vulnerable adults.
Key provisions
- Defines ‘theft’ to include taking control of a vulnerable adult’s property while in a position of trust and confidence.
- Establishes affirmative defenses for gift-giving scenarios, requiring proof of a consistent pattern of giving.
- Creates felony classifications based on the value of stolen property (Class 1 misdemeanor to Class 2 felony).
- Specifies enhanced penalties for theft involving vulnerable adults and property values exceeding $100,000.
- Addresses the handling of scrap metal, including requirements for automotive recyclers and scrap metal dealers.
- Defines ‘vulnerable adult’ and expands the criteria for identifying individuals at risk of exploitation.
- Clarifies the definition of ‘adequate consideration’ for gifts.
- Establishes a ‘pattern of gift giving’ definition.
Who is affected
- Vulnerable adults
- Healthcare institutions
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours