campaign finance; state authority.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This concurrent memorial urges the United States Congress to consider a constitutional amendment that would allow states, like Arizona, to regulate campaign finance. It emphasizes the importance of states retaining authority over election laws and policies, aligning with the principles of federalism and the unique needs of each state’s electorate. The memorial argues that the Supreme Court’s interpretation of campaign spending as protected speech has unduly limited states’ ability to manage campaign finance.
Key provisions
- Requests a constitutional amendment to allow states to regulate campaign finance.
- Highlights the importance of federalism and states’ rights.
- References Arizona’s Constitution regarding campaign contribution publicity.
- Argues that the Supreme Court’s interpretation of campaign spending as free speech has been detrimental to state election governance.
- Calls for Congress to support state authority in election processes.
- Requests the Arizona Secretary of State to transmit the memorial to relevant congressional leaders.
Who is affected
- The United States Congress
- States (specifically Arizona)
- Citizens of Arizona
- Candidates for public office
- Campaign committees
Notable changes
- The memorial advocates for a constitutional amendment to shift authority over campaign finance from the federal government to the states.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours