To direct the Secretary of the Air Force to incorporate certain elements regarding depot-level maintenance coordination in at least one multinational exercise conducted in the area of operations of the United States Indo-Pacific Command, and for other purposes.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To President
- Became Law
Overview
This bill directs the Secretary of the Air Force to incorporate elements of depot-level maintenance coordination into at least one multinational exercise conducted in the Indo-Pacific Command area. Specifically, it requires the Air Force to plan with partner nations like South Korea and Australia on maintenance strategies, real-time coordination, and mutual recognition of airworthiness standards. The bill also mandates a report to Congress outlining lessons learned and potential challenges related to these partnerships.
Key provisions
- Requires the Secretary of the Air Force to include depot-level maintenance coordination in at least one Indo-Pacific Command exercise annually.
- Mandates binational or multinational planning sessions with partner nations on maintenance opportunities.
- Calls for real-time coordination to maintain munitions stock levels and resupply routes.
- Requires mutual recognition of airworthiness and maintenance certification.
- Directs the Air Force to coordinate with the Air Force Sustainment Center.
- Requires a report to Congress detailing lessons learned and potential challenges.
- Identifies specific areas for potential co-sustainment with partner nations.
- Addresses logistical, intellectual property, and regulatory impediments to partnerships.
Who is affected
- United States Air Force
- Republic of Korea
- Commonwealth of Australia
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours