Double Dependents Relief Act
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To President
- Became Law
Overview
The Double Dependents Relief Act proposes a new tax credit for working family caregivers. This credit allows eligible caregivers to claim up to 30% of qualified expenses paid for a dependent with long-term care needs, with a maximum credit of $10,000 per year. The bill defines ‘eligible caregiver’ and ‘qualified care recipient’ and outlines specific expenses that qualify, including respite care, counseling, and lost wages. The credit is phased out for higher-income taxpayers.
Key provisions
- Provides a 30% tax credit for qualified expenses paid by working family caregivers.
- Defines ‘eligible caregiver’ as an individual with a dependent who meets certain income and caregiving requirements.
- Defines ‘qualified care recipient’ as an individual requiring long-term care needs and certified by a licensed healthcare practitioner.
- Qualifies expenses such as respite care, counseling, lost wages, and travel costs.
- Limits the credit to a maximum of $10,000 per year.
- Includes an inflation adjustment starting in 2027.
- Phases out the credit based on modified adjusted gross income.
- Requires identification of the care recipient and certifying practitioner on the tax return.
Who is affected
- Working family caregivers
- Individuals with dependent family members requiring long-term care
- Taxpayers with earned income
- Families with lower to moderate incomes
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours