To amend the Mineral Leasing Act for Acquired Lands to make that Act applicable to hardrock minerals.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To President
- Became Law
Overview
This bill, the MERICA Act of 2025, amends the Mineral Leasing Act for Acquired Lands to broaden the types of federally acquired lands eligible for hardrock mineral leasing. Specifically, it clarifies that ‘hardrock minerals’ include deposits found in various rock types, base metals, precious metals, and gemstones, while excluding coal, oil, and other resources. The bill also modifies the definitions within the Mineral Leasing Act to align with these changes.
Key provisions
- Expands the definition of ‘hardrock mineral’ to include a wider range of minerals.
- Clarifies that all federally acquired lands are potentially eligible for hardrock mineral leasing.
- Excludes coal, oil, oil shale, gas, sodium, potassium, sulfur, and materials subject to the Materials Act of 1947 from being considered ‘hardrock minerals’.
- Modifies definitions within the Mineral Leasing Act to align with the expanded scope of ‘hardrock mineral’.
Who is affected
- Federal Government
- Mining Companies
- Landowners (Federal)
- Environmental Groups
- Energy Industry
Notable changes
- Previously, hardrock mineral leasing was limited to lands acquired under specific statutes. This bill removes that restriction.
- The definition of ‘hardrock mineral’ is significantly expanded to include previously excluded minerals.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
3 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours