Protect Innocent Victims of Taxation After Fire Extension Act
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To President
- Became Law
Overview
This bill extends a provision that allows individuals who have lost property or suffered damages due to wildfires to exclude certain payments they receive from their gross income. Specifically, it defines ‘qualified wildfire relief payments’ as compensation for losses, expenses, or damages resulting from federally declared wildfires after 2014, provided those losses aren’t already covered by insurance. The bill also prevents taxpayers from claiming deductions or credits for expenses already covered by these relief payments, and it ensures that the basis of property isn’t increased due to these exclusions.
Key provisions
- Excludes qualified wildfire relief payments from gross income.
- Defines ‘qualified wildfire relief payment’ as compensation for wildfire-related losses, expenses, and damages.
- Specifies ‘qualified wildfire disaster’ as federally declared wildfires after December 31, 2014.
- Prevents taxpayers from claiming deductions or credits for expenses covered by relief payments.
- Prevents increases in the basis of property due to excluded payments.
- Extends the provision’s application until December 31, 2032.
- The changes take effect on December 31, 2025.
Who is affected
- Individuals
- Taxpayers
- Victims of wildfires
Notable changes
- Expands the existing provision regarding wildfire relief payments.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
9 on record
Primary sponsor
Doug LaMalfa
Cosponsors
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours