National Flood Insurance Program Clarification Act of 2026
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to take a stance, submit a written position, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To President
- Became Law
Overview
This bill clarifies the application of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Specifically, it limits the ESA’s impact on certain actions taken by the NFIP administrator, such as those related to flood risk management and property elevation. The bill also directs the Fish and Wildlife Service to withdraw existing biological opinions that assess the program’s effects on endangered species. The changes aim to streamline NFIP operations and reduce potential legal challenges related to ESA compliance.
Key provisions
- Limits the application of the Endangered Species Act to specific NFIP actions.
- Excludes certain sections of the NFIP from ESA review.
- Requires the Fish and Wildlife Service to withdraw existing biological opinions concerning the NFIP.
- Addresses land management and use criteria within the NFIP.
Who is affected
- National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
- Federal Government (specifically the Department of the Interior and Fish and Wildlife Service)
- Property Owners (potentially)
- Endangered Species
- Land Developers
Notable changes
- Reduces potential legal hurdles for the NFIP due to ESA regulations.
- Directs a specific action by the Fish and Wildlife Service to remove existing assessments.
- Modifies criteria for land management and use within the NFIP context.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
4 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours