Occupational and professional licensing
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This bill changes South Carolina’s licensing laws to allow individuals with current and valid employment authorization from federal immigration authorities to pursue occupational or professional licenses, provided they meet all other standard requirements for licensure. It adds a new section to the state’s code specifically addressing this eligibility. The bill aims to broaden access to professional licenses for individuals authorized to work in the United States. This change is intended to remove a barrier to employment for those with immigration status.
Key provisions
- Individuals with current, valid employment authorization from federal immigration authorities are eligible for occupational or professional licenses.
- Eligibility is contingent upon meeting all other requirements for licensure.
- The bill amends Article 1, Chapter 1, Title 40 of the S.C. Code.
- A new section (40-1-35) is added to the code to establish this eligibility.
- The bill takes effect upon Governor approval.
Who is affected
- Individuals authorized to work in the United States
- Occupational and professional licensing boards in South Carolina
- Employers in South Carolina
- Immigration authorities
- Federal government
Notable changes
- Previously, individuals lacking full immigration status were generally ineligible for occupational or professional licenses in South Carolina.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
2 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsor
J.L. Johnson
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours