HB 2570
To enable National Park Service Officers to enforce WV and local laws in the National Parks in this state.
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take action- Introduced
- Passed House of Delegates
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill would allow National Park Service officers to exercise the same law enforcement powers as West Virginia and local law enforcement officers within national parks and recreation areas in West Virginia. Specifically, federal officers on a list including FBI agents, DEA agents, and park rangers can enforce state and local laws in these areas under certain circumstances, such as requests for assistance or the occurrence of a felony. The bill also outlines protections and immunities for these officers, including those related to liability and tort claims.
Key provisions
- Federal law enforcement officers on a specific list (including FBI, DEA, and park rangers) can request assistance from state or local law enforcement.
- Officers can enforce state and local laws in national parks and recreation areas.
- The bill applies when a request for assistance is made within the scope of authority and jurisdiction.
- Officers are subject to the same exemptions and exceptions as state or local law enforcement officers.
- Officers are not considered employees or agents of state or local law enforcement agencies.
- Officers may not initiate independent investigations beyond preserving evidence.
- Officers are subject to the Federal Tort Claims Act.
- Officers receive the same immunities from liability as state or local law enforcement officers.
Who is affected
- National Park Service Officers
- West Virginia State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies
- Visitors to National Parks and Recreation Areas in West Virginia
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours