Transportation: omnibus bill.
Vote required
Majority
Fiscal committee
No
Appropriation
No
Current location
Passed
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This omnibus bill makes several changes to transportation regulations in California. It allows the Alameda County Transportation Commission to amend local transportation improvement programs, expanding the types of projects that can be funded. It clarifies the definition of the ‘Bays of San Francisco, San Pablo, and Suisun’ waterways, including Sacramento and Stockton ports, and updates pilotage insurance requirements. The bill also requires motor carriers, drivers, and shippers to comply with federal regulations for hazardous materials transportation and modifies automated traffic enforcement procedures, including making data on violations publicly available. Finally, it provides that no reimbursement is required for a specified reason related to the bill’s provisions.
Key provisions
- Authorizes the Alameda County Transportation Commission to amend local alternative transportation improvement programs.
- Clarifies the definition of the ‘Bays of San Francisco, San Pablo, and Suisun’ waterways to include the Ports of Sacramento and Stockton.
- Requires motor carriers, drivers, vehicles, and shippers to comply with federal regulations for hazardous materials transportation.
- Mandates the public disclosure of data on automated traffic enforcement violations.
- Modifies automated traffic enforcement system requirements, including a 60-day warning period and allowing community service in lieu of fines.
- Provides that no reimbursement is required for a specified reason.
- Amends Sections 1110 and 1198 of the Harbors and Navigation Code to clarify pilotage regulations.
- Updates Section 21455.9 of the Vehicle Code regarding automated traffic enforcement.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
1 on record
Primary sponsor
Committee on Transportation
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours