Voting by mail.
Fiscal committee
No
Current location
Chaptered
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Create an account to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Progress
Where this bill stands in the legislative process.
- Introduced
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Overview
This joint resolution expresses California’s opposition to any federal executive action that would restrict or interfere with the state’s vote by mail system. It calls upon the U.S. Congress to reject any federal legislation that would limit or eliminate vote by mail options and to uphold the authority of states to manage their elections. The resolution highlights the security and popularity of California’s vote by mail system and emphasizes its importance for accessible voting, particularly for vulnerable populations.
Key provisions
- Declares opposition to federal executive actions restricting California’s vote by mail system.
- Calls upon the U.S. Congress to reject federal legislation limiting vote by mail.
- Affirms the safety, security, and integrity of California’s vote by mail system.
- Reaffirms the right of California voters to vote by mail.
- Requests the state’s election officials to continue to maintain secure ballot handling procedures.
- Specifically opposes Executive Order No. 14399.
- Directs the Chief Clerk to transmit the resolution to federal officials.
Who is affected
- California voters
- California election officials
- U.S. Congress
- The United States Postal Service
- Registered voters
Notable changes
- The resolution directly addresses and opposes Executive Order No. 14399, issued by President Trump.
Bill text
Read the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Text extraction is in progress. View the official source.
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
54 on record
Primary sponsor
Cosponsors
Arguments
Reasons offered for and against this legislation.
Arguments in favor
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yours