S 1206
An Act standardizing consideration of pets in divorce and separation
Take action
Record your position on this measure.
Sign in to record your position, submit testimony, or contact your legislator.
Sign in to take action- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became Law
Bill overview
This bill aims to create a more consistent approach to how pets are considered during divorce and separation proceedings in Massachusetts. Currently, the treatment of pets in these cases can vary significantly depending on the court and the specific circumstances. The legislation seeks to establish clear guidelines and procedures for courts to ensure that pets’ well-being is thoughtfully addressed as part of the divorce process.
Key provisions
- Requires courts to consider the pet's best interests when making decisions related to divorce or separation.
- Establishes a process for determining pet custody arrangements.
- May include provisions for pet-related financial support (e.g., for vet care or housing).
- Could outline guidelines for shared pet ownership arrangements.
- Potentially addresses the impact of divorce on pets' emotional well-being.
- May require mediation or other alternative dispute resolution methods for pet-related issues.
- Could establish a timeline for decisions regarding pets during divorce proceedings.
- Specifies how a pet’s history and needs should be considered.
Who is affected
- Pet owners going through divorce or separation.
- Divorcing couples with pets.
- Massachusetts courts.
- Animal welfare organizations.
- Legal professionals involved in divorce cases.
Notable changes
Sponsors
Official sponsors from legislative records.
Primary sponsor
Michael O. Moore
Cosponsors
Adam J. Scanlon
Bruce E. Tarr
Jacob R. Oliveira
James K. Hawkins
Arguments in favor
Reasons to support this legislation.
No arguments in favor have been submitted.
Submit yoursArguments opposed
Reasons to oppose this legislation.
No arguments opposed have been submitted.
Submit yoursRead the latest version inline or switch to a previous version.
Bill S.1206 194th (Current)
An Act standardizing consideration of pets in divorce and separation
By Mr. Moore, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1206) of Michael O. Moore, Michael D. Brady, James K. Hawkins, Jacob R. Oliveira and other members of the General Court for legislation relative to pets in divorce and separation. The Judiciary.
View Text Print Preview Download PDF
Bill Information
Bill Information
Presenter: Michael O. Moore Status: Referred to Senate Committee on Ways and Means Special Attachments: Committee - Senate member votes
Tabs
Bill History Petitioners Primary Sponsor Summary
Bill History
Displaying 5 actions for Bill S.1206
| Date | Branch | Action |
| 2/27/2025 | Senate | Referred to the committee on The Judiciary |
| 2/27/2025 | House | House concurred |
| 4/18/2025 | Joint | Hearing scheduled for 04/22/2025 from 01:00 PM-05:00 PM in A-2 |
| 6/16/2025 | Senate | Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on Senate Ways and Means |
| 10/14/2025 | Joint | Hearing scheduled for 04/22/2025 from 01:00 PM-05:00 PM in A-2 |
Similar Bills
H.1817 194th (Current)
An Act standardizing consideration of pets in divorce and separation
H.1186 194th (Current)
An Act relative to pet insurance in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
S.1022 194th (Current)
An Act to maintain stable housing for families with pets
S.682 187th (2011 - 2012)
An Act relative to domestic violence and animals
S.1172 188th (2013 - 2014)
ensuring the safety of people with pets in disasters
The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The General Court provides this information as a public service and while we endeavor to keep the data accurate and current to the best of our ability, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.